How accurate are the results from self-testing for covid-19 at home?

By Michael Brooks

Agvi Firdau/Ina Picture Agency/Sipa Usa/PA Images

IN THE UK, essential employees are now amongst those being sent house testing sets for coronavirus. This includes swabbing the within your own nose and the back of your throat, however how helpful are the results?

Studies from early in the break out in China have actually recommended that swabs taken by healthcare experts might offer a 30 per cent “incorrect negative” rate, where contaminated individuals are informed they don’t have the virus ( NEJM, doi.org/ggmzsp; medRxiv, doi.org/dvfr). This has triggered claims that self-testing will give much more false negatives and might raise the danger of contaminated people spreading out the virus.

No test is best– swabbing technique and analysis errors can lead to incorrect results. There is no specified incorrect negative level at which covid-19 tests become worthless. “It depends what concern you’re asking,” states Graham Cooke at Imperial College London.

Advertisement

On a nationwide level, false negatives matter less, as testing can still offer a beneficial sign of the rates and levels of infection, supplying the incorrect unfavorable rate isn’t too high.

Nevertheless, incorrect negatives in infected but symptomless people are more of an issue, as they might motivate changes in behaviour that spread out the infection. If experienced healthcare employees get a 30 percent false unfavorable rate when administering tests, how bad might self-testing be?

There is factor for optimism.

A more current study in the United States suggests self-swabbing is fairly efficient.

The specialists identified more favorable outcomes, but the self-swabbers were within 10 per cent of the professional positives ( medRxiv, doi.org/ggr7f6).

Last week, the US Food and Drug Administration authorised screening of home-collected saliva, however studies of saliva testing have yet to appear in peer-reviewed scholastic journals.

The UK isn’t yet turning to saliva testing. “We understand these tests and are awaiting peer-reviewed evidence,” a UK Department of Health and Social Care representative informed New Researcher